|
Menu
Login: | Update - Rule changes from the AGM and a questionI need to give you an update on the question at the end of this previous message - about who goes up and who goes down between leagues. The overwhelming response was to go back to the top two going up one division and the bottom two going down one division. Moving two divisions is just too big a jump for most teams an interesting outcome considering some teams actually went up and down three divsions when we had the 2a/2b/2c arrangement! The only reservation is for some teams at the lower end of tables. If they are clearly out of place then I'll reserve the right to bump them up an extra division as long as they're happy with that. Thanks for the feedback! Cheers, Richard
First of all, apologies that it's taking so long to get the minutes out. They're scrawled on bits of paper and ready to be written up when we get a bit of time. We'll get there. In the meantime, I'll post the changes we agreed to the rules along with a question which we decided should go out to the players in general as we couldn't make our minds up on the night. Rule changesIf you don't agree with these, please kick yourself for not showing up at the AGM and voicing your opinion.
QuestionThere was a lot of discussion around whether the winning teams of each division should go up two divisions and the losers going down two divisions. Some teams fell that's too much movement and they don't want to go that high that quickly. Most teams don't want to go down that far either. So the question is: do you want to carry on with the up two divisions rule for the winner or shall we return to the up one division for the top two teams? If you do like the 'up two' rule, which division should that start at? Whatever we decide (based on majority voting) will apply to the current summer league as well. Either way we will continue with two teams up and two teams down. The question is over how far the winners/losers go. Please let me know what you think. And finallyWe would like more people to come along to the AGM and contribute to the running of the county. Some come along for exaclty that reason and some come just to save a fiver for their team. We're wondering what we could do to make it more appealing such as:
What do you think? What could we do different to encourage you to come along? It's your county and we want your views on how it should run and there's no reason to not have a bit of fun while we're doing it! Cheers, Richard - on behalf of the committee
|